Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance
Policy
Since its founding, the Panasonic Group has been guided by the management philosophy of “contributing to the progress and development of society and the well-being of people worldwide through its business activities.” Then, in April 2022, the Group shifted to an operating company system (holding company system) with Panasonic Holdings Corporation as the parent company, in order to advance our corporate management from a medium- to long-term perspective, as the changes in the business environment become more drastic and uncertain each year. Panasonic Energy, one of the Group’s operating companies, views corporate governance as an important foundation. We are striving to build and strengthen an effective corporate governance structure by setting up the Board of Directors, which makes decisions on important business operations related to the entire Company and supervises the directors’ execution of their duties, and the Audit & Supervisory Board System, which is independent from the Board of Directors and audits the directors’ execution of their duties, as well as the Nomination and Compensation Advisory Committee and other important committees.
Policy
Since its founding, the Panasonic Group has been guided by the management philosophy of “contributing to the progress and development of society and the well-being of people worldwide through its business activities.” Then, in April 2022, the Group shifted to an operating company system (holding company system) with Panasonic Holdings Corporation as the parent company, in order to advance our corporate management from a medium- to long-term perspective, as the changes in the business environment become more drastic and uncertain each year. Panasonic Energy, one of the Group’s operating companies, views corporate governance as an important foundation. We are striving to build and strengthen an effective corporate governance structure by setting up the Board of Directors, which makes decisions on important business operations related to the entire Company and supervises the directors’ execution of their duties, and the Audit & Supervisory Board System, which is independent from the Board of Directors and audits the directors’ execution of their duties, as well as the Nomination and Compensation Advisory Committee and other important committees.
Corporate governance structure and initiatives
The Board of Directors
The Board of Directors of the Company consists of five directors and three Audit & Supervisory Board members (as of April 2025), all of whom have excellent insight into the Company’s business areas along with sophisticated business execution skills. The Board of Directors meets at least once a month for the purpose of promoting appropriate business activities by making prompt and accurate management decisions.
In addition, the Board of Directors is able to respond quickly to sudden changes in the business environment and to situations where strong business execution is required, by flexibly making extraordinary resolutions and reports at actual meetings or in writing as necessary. In fiscal 2025, the Company’s Board of Directors held 12 regular meetings and five extraordinary meetings, including written resolutions. The attendance rate of directors at the Board of Directors meetings during the fiscal year was 99.1%, and that of Audit & Supervisory Board members was 100%.
Corporate governance structure (as of April 2025)
* Enterprise Risk Management
Audit & Supervisory Board Members
The Company appoints two Senior Audit & Supervisory Board members selected from among those with advanced auditing capabilities who are familiar with the Company’s operations. In addition, the Company also appoints one Audit & Supervisory Board member with knowledge and experience in finance and accounting to monitor the governance system of the Panasonic Energy Group and its operations, and to ensure an efficient and organizational audit system. Under an independent appointment system that allows them to exercise their auditing functions solely in accordance with their discretionary judgment, rather than by majority vote, Audit & Supervisory Board members attend Board of Directors meetings to express their opinions, conduct regular on-site inspections, including field inspections and interviews with employees and other relevant personnel, and audit daily management activities, including the execution of duties by directors. In addition, Audit & Supervisory Board meetings are held regularly among Audit & Supervisory Board members to formulate audit policies and exchange information, and the Audit & Supervisory Board members also cooperate with the internal auditing departments and accounting auditors by regularly exchanging information.
Meeting Bodies/Committees
The Company has established a Management Meeting, consisting of executive officers, as a preliminary body to the Board of Directors, which makes practical decisions and enables more in-depth discussions at subsequent meetings of the Board of Directors.
The Company has twelve executive officers, each of whom holds deep knowledge and experience in their respective fields. The Management Meeting meets twice a month in principle to make decisions based on prompt and appropriate discussions and reports on matters related to the overall management of the Company, and to establish and strengthen the Company’s governance by clarifying the process and scope of decision-making in the Company.
Furthermore, we have established the Nomination and Compensation Advisory Committee to strengthen objectivity and transparency in the appointment, dismissal, and compensation of directors and executive officers. In addition, we have established an ERM Committee to identify, assess, and formulate measures to address cross-organizational risks at the Panasonic Energy Group. Furthermore, we established an ESG Committee, which is responsible for formulating an overall plan for ESG, monitoring progress, assessing progress, and reporting and making recommendations to the Board of Directors.
Initiatives to improve the effectiveness of the Board of Directors
Based on the Corporate Governance Code Supplemental Principle 4-11 (3), each director and Audit & Supervisory Board member conducted a self-evaluation of the operation of the Board of Directors in fiscal 2024. The self-evaluation included the following questions: (1) Has the Board of Directors sufficiently demonstrated its supervisory function, (2) Are issues of importance to the Company set as agenda items for Board of Directors meetings, (3) With regard to agenda items, are issues and points to be discussed and examined clearly defined, and are possible risks and their analysis properly explained at Board of Directors meetings, (4) Are medium- to long-term strategies adequately discussed at Board of Directors meetings? The self-evaluation also included (5) a review of the previous fiscal year’s initiatives. The evaluation was an anonymous survey, and each evaluation item was rated on a 5-point scale, with a comment section.
As a result of the self-evaluation, there were opinions that the Board of Directors needs to further improve its effectiveness. To this end, we are pursuing initiatives such as strengthening our monitoring system for residual risks in important transactions, enhancing deliberations by utilizing risk assessment sheets, and improving our ability to respond quickly to changes in the market and industry. These initiatives have resulted in the effective operation of the Board of Directors and strengthened corporate governance.
Overview of the executive remuneration system
The remuneration system for executive officers consists of fixedbased salary and performance-based remuneration as an incentive linked to short-term and mid-long term business results. Performance-based remuneration is determined based on the degree of achievement against financial targets, such as operating cash flow and EBITDA, and non-financial targets, such as KPIs in the function for which the executive officer is responsible and environmental contribution from an environmental, social and governance (ESG) perspective.
By incorporating environmental contributions, serious accidents, and compliance as ESG perspectives in our non-financial targets, we are working to enhance corporate value not only from a financial perspective but also from a non-financial perspective.
Internal control
The Company’s Board of Directors has formulated the “Basic Policy for the Establishment of Internal Control Systems” which stipulates the following: ensuring the adequacy of business operations and reporting systems in the Group, ensuring the legality and efficiency of the execution of duties by directors, risk management, and ensuring the independence and effectiveness of corporate auditors.
Based on each of these basic policies, the Company establishes and operates various regulations, committees, etc., provides education, conducts on-site inspections and audits including those of subsidiaries, and operates a fraud prevention and early detection hotline, as well as a transaction and contract risk management system. By establishing these internal control systems, we continuously strive for stronger governance, sound and efficient business operations, and a stronger management foundation.
ERM Committee
The Company considers it an important management issue to ensure the achievement of its business objectives and sustainable and stable development by accurately managing risks and taking appropriate countermeasures and promotes risk management based on its Risk Management Basic Regulations.
As a framework for promoting risk management within the Company, the “Enterprise Risk Management Committee” (“ERM Committee”), which is chaired by the Officer in Charge of Risk Management and includes the heads of Legal, Human Resources, Accounting, and other functional departments and Audit & Supervisory Board members, has been established to manage risks arising from business and operations. The ERM Committee reports regularly at the Management Meeting on significant risks and the progress of countermeasures based on the PDCA cycle of risk management. In this way, the Management Meeting supervises and verifies the effectiveness and efficiency of risk management.
The Company defines “operational risk” as events that have the potential to affect our business activities and pose an operational threat. The Company also updates its “risk inventory” once a year by comprehensively identifying possible operational risks based on changes in external and internal factors, and conducts risk assessment of all risks in the inventory, using both financial and non-financial evaluation axes. In addition, when formulating management and business strategies and making decisions, uncertain events that may present opportunities or threats to the achievement of business objectives are considered and extracted as “strategic risks” in conjunction with operational risk assessments.
The ERM Committee deliberates on the results of the risk assessment from the perspective of the Company’s management and business strategies and social responsibility, and selects candidates for material management risks. The candidate material risks selected by the ERM Committee are submitted to the Management Meeting, which deliberates on them and determines the Company’s material risks. Once material risks are determined, the risk owner takes the lead in formulating and implementing countermeasures and monitoring progress, with the goal of continuous improvement.
ERM structure
Director experience (as of April 2025)
Kazuo Tadanobu
Representative Director,
President
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
| Apr. 1992 | Joined Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. |
| Jul. 2020 | Vice President of Industrial Solutions Company, Panasonic Corporation |
| Oct. 2021 | President of Energy Company of the company |
| Apr. 2022 | Representative Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Panasonic Energy Co., Ltd. (incumbent) |
Masaru Miki
Director, Managing
Executive Officer
Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO)
In Charge of General Affairs
| Apr. 1991 | Joined Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. |
| Jun. 2014 | Seconded to Panasonic India Private Ltd., Director, Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO) of the company. |
| Apr. 2017 | Seconded to Panasonic India Private Ltd., Director, Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO) of the company / General Manager, Global Human Resource Department of Panasonic Corporation |
| Oct. 2021 | Managing Officer of Energy Company |
| Apr. 2022 | Managing Executive Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO) of Panasonic Energy Co., Ltd. (incumbent) |
| Apr. 2024 | Director, Managing Executive Officer of the company |
| Jun. 2025 | Representative Director, Managing Executive Officer of the company (incumbent) |
Yasuaki Takamoto
Representative Director,
Executive Vice President
Director, Mobility Energy
Business Division
| Apr. 1993 | Joined Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. |
| Apr. 2019 | Vice President of US Company, Panasonic Corporation |
| Oct. 2021 | Executive Vice President of Energy Company of the company |
| Apr. 2022 | Representative Director, Executive Vice President of Panasonic Energy Co., Ltd. |
| Jun. 2025 | Director, Executive Vice President of the company (incumbent) |
Masaaki Mizoguchi
Director, Managing
Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
| Apr. 1994 | Joined Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. |
| Apr. 2016 | Director of Panasonic Liquid Crystal Display Co., Ltd., AIS Company, Panasonic Corporation |
| Oct. 2021 | Managing Officer of Energy Company |
| Apr. 2022 | Director, Managing Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of Panasonic Energy Co., Ltd. |
Kunio Tanaka
Director, Managing
Executive Officer
Chief Strategy Officer (CSO)
In charge of Brand Strategy
| Apr. 1983 | Joined Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. |
| Apr. 2017 | Managing Officer, AIS Company, Panasonic Corporation |
| Apr. 2019 | General Manager, Global Business Promotion Department, Corporate Strategy Division and Vice President of Panasonic North America, US Company of the company |
| Oct. 2021 | Managing Officer of Energy Company |
| Apr. 2022 | Director, Managing Executive Officer, and Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) of Panasonic Energy Co., Ltd. (incumbent) |
Corporate governance structure and initiatives
The Board of Directors
The Board of Directors of the Company consists of five directors and three Audit & Supervisory Board members (as of April 2025), all of whom have excellent insight into the Company’s business areas along with sophisticated business execution skills. The Board of Directors meets at least once a month for the purpose of promoting appropriate business activities by making prompt and accurate management decisions.
In addition, the Board of Directors is able to respond quickly to sudden changes in the business environment and to situations where strong business execution is required, by flexibly making extraordinary resolutions and reports at actual meetings or in writing as necessary. In fiscal 2025, the Company’s Board of Directors held 12 regular meetings and five extraordinary meetings, including written resolutions. The attendance rate of directors at the Board of Directors meetings during the fiscal year was 99.1%, and that of Audit & Supervisory Board members was 100%.
Corporate governance structure (as of April 2025)
* Enterprise Risk Management
Audit & Supervisory Board Members
The Company appoints two Senior Audit & Supervisory Board members selected from among those with advanced auditing capabilities who are familiar with the Company’s operations. In addition, the Company also appoints one Audit & Supervisory Board member with knowledge and experience in finance and accounting to monitor the governance system of the Panasonic Energy Group and its operations, and to ensure an efficient and organizational audit system. Under an independent appointment system that allows them to exercise their auditing functions solely in accordance with their discretionary judgment, rather than by majority vote, Audit & Supervisory Board members attend Board of Directors meetings to express their opinions, conduct regular on-site inspections, including field inspections and interviews with employees and other relevant personnel, and audit daily management activities, including the execution of duties by directors. In addition, Audit & Supervisory Board meetings are held regularly among Audit & Supervisory Board members to formulate audit policies and exchange information, and the Audit & Supervisory Board members also cooperate with the internal auditing departments and accounting auditors by regularly exchanging information.
Meeting Bodies/Committees
The Company has established a Management Meeting, consisting of executive officers, as a preliminary body to the Board of Directors, which makes practical decisions and enables more in-depth discussions at subsequent meetings of the Board of Directors.
The Company has twelve executive officers, each of whom holds deep knowledge and experience in their respective fields. The Management Meeting meets twice a month in principle to make decisions based on prompt and appropriate discussions and reports on matters related to the overall management of the Company, and to establish and strengthen the Company’s governance by clarifying the process and scope of decision-making in the Company.
Furthermore, we have established the Nomination and Compensation Advisory Committee to strengthen objectivity and transparency in the appointment, dismissal, and compensation of directors and executive officers. In addition, we have established an ERM Committee to identify, assess, and formulate measures to address cross-organizational risks at the Panasonic Energy Group. Furthermore, we established an ESG Committee, which is responsible for formulating an overall plan for ESG, monitoring progress, assessing progress, and reporting and making recommendations to the Board of Directors.
Initiatives to improve the effectiveness of the Board of Directors
Based on the Corporate Governance Code Supplemental Principle 4-11 (3), each director and Audit & Supervisory Board member conducted a self-evaluation of the operation of the Board of Directors in fiscal 2024. The self-evaluation included the following questions: (1) Has the Board of Directors sufficiently demonstrated its supervisory function, (2) Are issues of importance to the Company set as agenda items for Board of Directors meetings, (3) With regard to agenda items, are issues and points to be discussed and examined clearly defined, and are possible risks and their analysis properly explained at Board of Directors meetings, (4) Are medium- to long-term strategies adequately discussed at Board of Directors meetings? The self-evaluation also included (5) a review of the previous fiscal year’s initiatives. The evaluation was an anonymous survey, and each evaluation item was rated on a 5-point scale, with a comment section.
As a result of the self-evaluation, there were opinions that the Board of Directors needs to further improve its effectiveness. To this end, we are pursuing initiatives such as strengthening our monitoring system for residual risks in important transactions, enhancing deliberations by utilizing risk assessment sheets, and improving our ability to respond quickly to changes in the market and industry. These initiatives have resulted in the effective operation of the Board of Directors and strengthened corporate governance.
Overview of the executive remuneration system
The remuneration system for executive officers consists of fixedbased salary and performance-based remuneration as an incentive linked to short-term and mid-long term business results. Performance-based remuneration is determined based on the degree of achievement against financial targets, such as operating cash flow and EBITDA, and non-financial targets, such as KPIs in the function for which the executive officer is responsible and environmental contribution from an environmental, social and governance (ESG) perspective.
By incorporating environmental contributions, serious accidents, and compliance as ESG perspectives in our non-financial targets, we are working to enhance corporate value not only from a financial perspective but also from a non-financial perspective.
Internal control
The Company’s Board of Directors has formulated the “Basic Policy for the Establishment of Internal Control Systems” which stipulates the following: ensuring the adequacy of business operations and reporting systems in the Group, ensuring the legality and efficiency of the execution of duties by directors, risk management, and ensuring the independence and effectiveness of corporate auditors.
Based on each of these basic policies, the Company establishes and operates various regulations, committees, etc., provides education, conducts on-site inspections and audits including those of subsidiaries, and operates a fraud prevention and early detection hotline, as well as a transaction and contract risk management system. By establishing these internal control systems, we continuously strive for stronger governance, sound and efficient business operations, and a stronger management foundation.
ERM Committee
The Company considers it an important management issue to ensure the achievement of its business objectives and sustainable and stable development by accurately managing risks and taking appropriate countermeasures and promotes risk management based on its Risk Management Basic Regulations.
As a framework for promoting risk management within the Company, the “Enterprise Risk Management Committee” (“ERM Committee”), which is chaired by the Officer in Charge of Risk Management and includes the heads of Legal, Human Resources, Accounting, and other functional departments and Audit & Supervisory Board members, has been established to manage risks arising from business and operations. The ERM Committee reports regularly at the Management Meeting on significant risks and the progress of countermeasures based on the PDCA cycle of risk management. In this way, the Management Meeting supervises and verifies the effectiveness and efficiency of risk management.
The Company defines “operational risk” as events that have the potential to affect our business activities and pose an operational threat. The Company also updates its “risk inventory” once a year by comprehensively identifying possible operational risks based on changes in external and internal factors, and conducts risk assessment of all risks in the inventory, using both financial and non-financial evaluation axes. In addition, when formulating management and business strategies and making decisions, uncertain events that may present opportunities or threats to the achievement of business objectives are considered and extracted as “strategic risks” in conjunction with operational risk assessments.
The ERM Committee deliberates on the results of the risk assessment from the perspective of the Company’s management and business strategies and social responsibility, and selects candidates for material management risks. The candidate material risks selected by the ERM Committee are submitted to the Management Meeting, which deliberates on them and determines the Company’s material risks. Once material risks are determined, the risk owner takes the lead in formulating and implementing countermeasures and monitoring progress, with the goal of continuous improvement.
ERM structure
Director experience (as of April 2025)
Kazuo Tadanobu
Representative Director,
President
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
| Apr. 1992 | Joined Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. |
| Jul. 2020 | Vice President of Industrial Solutions Company, Panasonic Corporation |
| Oct. 2021 | President of Energy Company of the company |
| Apr. 2022 | Representative Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Panasonic Energy Co., Ltd. (incumbent) |
Masaru Miki
Director, Managing
Executive Officer
Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO)
In Charge of General Affairs
| Apr. 1991 | Joined Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. |
| Jun. 2014 | Seconded to Panasonic India Private Ltd., Director, Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO) of the company. |
| Apr. 2017 | Seconded to Panasonic India Private Ltd., Director, Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO) of the company / General Manager, Global Human Resource Department of Panasonic Corporation |
| Oct. 2021 | Managing Officer of Energy Company |
| Apr. 2022 | Managing Executive Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO) of Panasonic Energy Co., Ltd. (incumbent) |
| Apr. 2024 | Director, Managing Executive Officer of the company |
| Jun. 2025 | Representative Director, Managing Executive Officer of the company (incumbent) |
Yasuaki Takamoto
Representative Director,
Executive Vice President
Director, Mobility Energy
Business Division
| Apr. 1993 | Joined Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. |
| Apr. 2019 | Vice President of US Company, Panasonic Corporation |
| Oct. 2021 | Executive Vice President of Energy Company of the company |
| Apr. 2022 | Representative Director, Executive Vice President of Panasonic Energy Co., Ltd. |
| Jun. 2025 | Director, Executive Vice President of the company (incumbent) |
Masaaki Mizoguchi
Director, Managing
Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
| Apr. 1994 | Joined Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. |
| Apr. 2016 | Director of Panasonic Liquid Crystal Display Co., Ltd., AIS Company, Panasonic Corporation |
| Oct. 2021 | Managing Officer of Energy Company |
| Apr. 2022 | Director, Managing Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of Panasonic Energy Co., Ltd. |
Kunio Tanaka
Director, Managing
Executive Officer
Chief Strategy Officer (CSO)
In charge of Brand Strategy
| Apr. 1983 | Joined Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. |
| Apr. 2017 | Managing Officer, AIS Company, Panasonic Corporation |
| Apr. 2019 | General Manager, Global Business Promotion Department, Corporate Strategy Division and Vice President of Panasonic North America, US Company of the company |
| Oct. 2021 | Managing Officer of Energy Company |
| Apr. 2022 | Director, Managing Executive Officer, and Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) of Panasonic Energy Co., Ltd. (incumbent) |