ESG promotion structure

Panasonic Energy established its ESG Committee, chaired by the President, to formulate an overall ESG plan, monitor its progress, and evaluate its achievement status. In addition, based on the outcomes of its deliberations, the Committee makes annual reports and recommendations to the Board of Directors to ensure that ESG considerations are integrated into the management decision-making process.

In promoting specific measures, we designate Executive Officer, or other person to take charge of addressing each of the seven material issues, set medium- to long-term visions and key performance indicators (KPIs) for each material issue, and formulate action plans to achieve them. Based on progress reports from the aforementioned persons in charge, the ESG Committee monitors and evaluates activities, estimates the effectiveness of measures, and encourages their improvements. In these ways, we have established the PDCA cycle throughout the year.

In fiscal 2025, in addition to confirming the results of the previous fiscal year and reviewing progress, we conducted interim reviews of the three material issues that are particularly important for improving our company’s growth potential—namely achieving decarbonization, realizing a circular society, and promoting human capital management and respecting for human rights— to identify any issues and advance the steady implementation of corrective measures. The issues we identified include: responding to increasingly complex laws and regulations and customer requirements, enhancement of non-financial goal setting and management, and instilling ESG values among our employees. The Company has therefore resolved to redouble its efforts on each of these issues with the goal of achieving ESG-focused management that leverages growth.

ESG promotion structure

Panasonic Energy established its ESG Committee, chaired by the President, to formulate an overall ESG plan, monitor its progress, and evaluate its achievement status. In addition, based on the outcomes of its deliberations, the Committee makes annual reports and recommendations to the Board of Directors to ensure that ESG considerations are integrated into the management decision-making process.

In promoting specific measures, we designate Executive Officer, or other person to take charge of addressing each of the seven material issues, set medium- to long-term visions and key performance indicators (KPIs) for each material issue, and formulate action plans to achieve them. Based on progress reports from the aforementioned persons in charge, the ESG Committee monitors and evaluates activities, estimates the effectiveness of measures, and encourages their improvements. In these ways, we have established the PDCA cycle throughout the year.

In fiscal 2025, in addition to confirming the results of the previous fiscal year and reviewing progress, we conducted interim reviews of the three material issues that are particularly important for improving our company’s growth potential—namely achieving decarbonization, realizing a circular society, and promoting human capital management and respecting for human rights— to identify any issues and advance the steady implementation of corrective measures. The issues we identified include: responding to increasingly complex laws and regulations and customer requirements, enhancement of non-financial goal setting and management, and instilling ESG values among our employees. The Company has therefore resolved to redouble its efforts on each of these issues with the goal of achieving ESG-focused management that leverages growth.

Material issues (materiality)

We have identified material issues (materiality) that we must address from an environmental, social, and governance (ESG) perspective in order to contribute to a sustainable society.

Materiality identification process

Panasonic Energy identified seven material issues using the following four steps.


Step.1



List social issues


We listed 71 social issues that are candidates for materiality.


Step.2



Evaluate their importance from the perspective of Panasonic Energy


For each item on the list of social issues, we evaluated its impact on our business and relevance to our policies from Panasonic Energy’s perspective.


Step.3



Evaluate their importance from a stakeholder perspective


For each item on the list of social issues, we evaluated its importance from the perspective of all stakeholders, based on the opinions we have obtained through dialogue with stakeholders to date and the interest of investors and certifying organizations.


Step.4



Deliberate and identify


After sorting out our thoughts on ESG management and what we aim to achieve, we identified seven material issues through multiple rounds of deliberations between the officers, including the Representative Director, and staffs of the relevant departments.

Materiality matrix

We evaluated social issues from two perspectives: their importance to Panasonic Energy and their importance to our stakeholders, and plotted the most important of these issues in the materiality matrix below

Materiality Matrix. Social issues were evaluated on the horizontal axis as importance to our company and on the vertical axis as importance to stakeholders. Among them, those of high importance are plotted as materiality.
Diagram illustrating seven material issues and corresponding initiatives, including circular economy, human capital management and respect for human rights, corporate governance, decarbonization, energy contribution to society, responsible procurement, and compliance enhancement.

Material issues (materiality)

We have identified material issues (materiality) that we must address from an environmental, social, and governance (ESG) perspective in order to contribute to a sustainable society.

Materiality identification process

Panasonic Energy identified seven material issues using the following four steps.


Step.1



List social issues


We listed 71 social issues that are candidates for materiality.


Step.2



Evaluate their importance from the perspective of Panasonic Energy


For each item on the list of social issues, we evaluated its impact on our business and relevance to our policies from Panasonic Energy’s perspective.


Step.3



Evaluate their importance from a stakeholder perspective


For each item on the list of social issues, we evaluated its importance from the perspective of all stakeholders, based on the opinions we have obtained through dialogue with stakeholders to date and the interest of investors and certifying organizations.


Step.4



Deliberate and identify


After sorting out our thoughts on ESG management and what we aim to achieve, we identified seven material issues through multiple rounds of deliberations between the officers, including the Representative Director, and staffs of the relevant departments.

Materiality matrix

We evaluated social issues from two perspectives: their importance to Panasonic Energy and their importance to our stakeholders, and plotted the most important of these issues in the materiality matrix below

Materiality Matrix. Social issues were evaluated on the horizontal axis as importance to our company and on the vertical axis as importance to stakeholders. Among them, those of high importance are plotted as materiality.
Diagram illustrating seven material issues and corresponding initiatives, including circular economy, human capital management and respect for human rights, corporate governance, decarbonization, energy contribution to society, responsible procurement, and compliance enhancement.

Materiality KPIs and progress

The KPIs for the identified material issues, the targets for fiscal 2031, and the results achieved to date are shown below.

Materiality KPIs and progress

The KPIs for the identified material issues, the targets for fiscal 2031, and the results achieved to date are shown below.


Dialogue with stakeholders

We place great importance on dialogue with a wide range of stakeholders around the world, including customers, investors, suppliers, governments, industry associations, NPOs and NGOs, local communities, and employees, and engage in dialogue at various stages of our operations. We also provide information on our activities to our stakeholders, and at the same time receive feedback from them regarding their expectations and concerns about us. We will incorporate such feedback into our business, product development, and ESG management activities to further enhance our corporate value.

Dialogue with stakeholders

We place great importance on dialogue with a wide range of stakeholders around the world, including customers, investors, suppliers, governments, industry associations, NPOs and NGOs, local communities, and employees, and engage in dialogue at various stages of our operations. We also provide information on our activities to our stakeholders, and at the same time receive feedback from them regarding their expectations and concerns about us. We will incorporate such feedback into our business, product development, and ESG management activities to further enhance our corporate value.